FTX U.S. choose expresses doubts about parallel Bahamian chapter


  • Bahamian liquidators need a better position in repaying FTX.com clients
  • Delaware choose says he has authority over FTX U.S. belongings
  • FTX disputes Bahamas assertion of management over FTX.com change

NEW YORK, June 8 (Reuters) – The choose overseeing FTX’s U.S. chapter stated Thursday that he wouldn’t defer to a Bahamian courtroom about key points like which FTX entity ought to acquire belongings and repay clients of the bankrupt crypto change.

Liquidators for FTX Digital Markets, the change’s Bahamas-based subsidiary, have requested U.S. Chapter Choose John Dorsey to allow them to search a ruling from the Bahamas Supreme Courtroom that their firm managed FTX.com’s crypto change for worldwide clients.

FTX’s U.S. chapter crew seeks to dam the Bahamas litigation, calling it an influence seize that may derail the corporate’s ongoing efforts to repay clients.

Dorsey questioned the worth of a Bahamian courtroom ruling throughout a Thursday courtroom listening to in Wilmington, Delaware, saying that he would retain authority over the $7 billion in belongings recovered by the U.S. debtors it doesn’t matter what the Bahamian courtroom guidelines. Each courts must log out earlier than any belongings switch from the U.S. to the Bahamas, Dorsey stated.

“It does not go to FTX Digital till I say it goes to FTX Digital,” Dorsey stated. “So what are we gaining by having two parallel proceedings in two separate courts?”

Chris Shore, an legal professional for the Bahamian liquidators, stated {that a} Bahamas courtroom ruling would make clear either side’s duties and supply a framework for cooperation between the U.S. chapter case and involuntary insolvency proceedings within the Bahamas.

The Bahamian insolvency case started at some point earlier than FTX Buying and selling and greater than 100 associates filed for chapter safety in Delaware to deal with claims that the corporate misused and misplaced billions in clients’ crypto deposits.

Dorsey stated he would make a ultimate ruling Friday, and he inspired the 2 sides to attempt to attain an settlement on the dispute in a single day.

The edges provided very totally different descriptions of how vital FTX Digital was to the crypto change’s operations.

The Bahamian liquidators argue that FTX Digital took on a central position when the FTX firms moved their headquarters to the Bahamas from Hong Kong in 2021, in the end taking accountability for all of FTX’s non-U.S. clients. A courtroom ruling of their favor may place the Bahamian firm, and never the U.S. debtors, in command of accumulating belongings and deciding distribute them to FTX clients.

FTX’s U.S.-based chapter crew argues that the Bahamian affiliate was a “company shell” and the “centerpiece” of founder Sam Bankman-Fried’s effort to funnel FTX buyer deposits “out of the attain of American regulators and courts.”

FTX founder Bankman-Fried and several other firm insiders have been indicted on fraud prices for his or her position within the firm’s collapse. In distinction to Bankman-Fried’s not-guilty plea, the previous members of his inside circle have pleaded responsible and agreed to cooperate with prosecutors.

The case is FTX Buying and selling, U.S. Chapter Courtroom for the District of Delaware, No. 22-11068.

For FTX: Andy Dietderich, Brian Glueckstein and James Bromley of Sullivan & Cromwell

For the Bahamian liquidators: Chris Shore of White & Case

Learn extra:

Bankrupt crypto change FTX has recovered $7.3 billion in belongings

FTX sues liquidators of its Bahamian affiliate over crypto change possession

FTX chapter legal professionals say they ‘don’t belief’ Bahamas authorities

Reporting by Dietrich Knauth

Our Requirements: The Thomson Reuters Belief Ideas.